How to Write a Method Statement That Passes Review

If you've ever had a method statement bounced back by a principal contractor with "not suitable for the works" scrawled across the top, you'll know it's rarely because the site team don't know how to do the job safely. It's because the document didn't say so clearly enough. A method statement isn't there to prove you're careful, it's there to prove it in a way a reviewer who has never seen your site can follow in five minutes flat.

Here's what actually gets a method statement through review first time, and what gets it sent back.

Start with the sequence, not the hazards

The most common mistake is writing a method statement as a list of hazards with controls bolted on, rather than a description of how the work is actually going to happen. A reviewer wants to see the job broken into a logical sequence of steps, in the order they'll happen on site. Something like:

  1. Site set up and welfare checks
  2. Isolate and permit
  3. Erect access equipment
  4. Carry out the works
  5. Inspect and sign off
  6. Strike down and clear

Once you've got the sequence right, the hazards and controls attach naturally to each step. A reviewer reading step 3 wants to see the access equipment risks addressed right there, not three pages later in a generic hazards table.

Be specific about who does what

"Operatives will wear appropriate PPE" tells a reviewer nothing. Which operatives, doing which task, wearing which PPE? A method statement that says "the two operatives erecting the tower scaffold will wear a harness clipped to the internal ladder at all times above 2m" is a document a reviewer can actually check against, and it's a document your site team can actually follow. Vague language is the single biggest reason method statements get rejected, because it reads as though the author hasn't actually thought through the task.

Match it to the RAMS, and to reality

A method statement and its risk assessment need to agree with each other. If the risk assessment identifies a hazard, the method statement needs to show the control for it in the sequence of work, not just repeat it as a bullet point. Reviewers cross check the two, and a mismatch (a hazard with no corresponding step, or a control mentioned in the method that never appears in the risk assessment) is one of the fastest ways to get sent back.

It also has to match what's actually going to happen on site. Copying and pasting a method statement from a previous, similar job is fine as a starting point, but only if you then go through it line by line and change anything that doesn't apply. Reviewers who've seen a lot of RAMS can usually spot a template that hasn't been adjusted, and it undermines confidence in the whole document.

Name the plant, not just "plant"

If you're using a specific piece of equipment, name it. "A 3.5 tonne excavator fitted with a quick hitch" is checkable. "Excavator" is not. The same goes for materials, chemicals and access equipment. Specificity is what turns a method statement from a generic safety document into one that describes your actual job.

Cover the edges: emergencies, weather, and what happens if it goes wrong

A method statement that only covers the job going to plan is incomplete. Reviewers look for:

  • What happens in an emergency (nearest muster point, who raises the alarm, first aid provision)
  • What stops the work (adverse weather limits, especially for work at height or lifting operations)
  • Who has the authority to stop the job on site if conditions change

These sections get skipped surprisingly often, and they're an easy thing for a reviewer to flag.

Keep it as long as it needs to be, and no longer

A ten page method statement for a straightforward task doesn't look more thorough, it looks like nobody has edited it. Reviewers are reading dozens of these. A tightly written document that covers the sequence, the hazards, the controls and the responsible people, without padding, is far more likely to get approved quickly than a bloated one that repeats itself.

If you keep getting RAMS rejected

If this is a recurring problem on your sites, it's usually not a competence issue, it's a documentation issue. The people doing the work know how to do it safely; the paperwork just isn't communicating that clearly enough for someone outside the team to see it at a glance. That's a fixable problem, and it's worth getting a professionally written RAMS document as a template you can adapt job to job, rather than starting from scratch (or from a tired old template) every time.

I write RAMS and method statements for UK construction sites for a living, built around how your specific job actually runs rather than a generic template. If you'd rather have one written properly than keep sending documents back and forth with a principal contractor, you can see the RAMS writing service here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Got a question about your own situation? Ask below and I will get back to you. Comments are checked before they go live so there may be a short delay.

Popular posts from this blog

HMO Fire Safety Requirements, Room by Room

 Short answer: what counts as compliant changes depending on which room you're standing in. HMOs get treated differently to a normal let because more unrelated people are sharing escape routes, so the requirements are more detailed room by room rather than one blanket rule for the whole property. BEDROOMS Doors opening onto an escape route generally need to be fire doors, rated FD30, with a self closer, intumescent strips and smoke seals fitted. Distance matters too: a bedroom should be within 18 metres of a way out, or 7.5 metres if there's only one direction of escape available. Smoke detection in bedrooms is normally covered by the property's interlinked alarm system rather than a standalone unit. KITCHENS Kitchens are usually the highest fire risk room in an HMO, and the requirements reflect that. Fire doors here need to be to the same FD30 standard as bedrooms. Detection is different though, shared kitchens should have heat detectors rather than smoke alarms, since coo...
Read more

What Inspectors Actually Look For in an HMO Inspection

 Short answer: they're checking three things, that people can escape a fire safely, that the amenities are adequate for how many people are actually living there, and that you've got the paperwork to prove you've been keeping on top of it. Miss any of the three and it shows immediately. FIRE SAFETY This is usually the first thing checked. Escape routes need to be clear and unobstructed, properly signed, with fire doors in the higher risk areas like kitchens and communal hallways. Fire extinguishers, where required, need to be accessible and show evidence of regular servicing. Smoke alarms on every floor, carbon monoxide detectors in any room with a fuel burning appliance, none of this is optional or something you can catch up on the morning of the visit. ROOM SIZES AND AMENITIES HMOs have legal minimum room sizes, 6.51 square metres for an adult, 4.64 for a child under 10, and inspectors will measure if they're unsure. Shared bathrooms and kitchens have to be genuinely ...
Read more

Fire Risk Assessment Checklist: What Actually Gets Checked

 Short answer: an assessor is checking whether people can get out safely, whether they'd know there's a fire in time to do it, and whether the building itself will hold back the fire long enough for that to happen. Everything on the checklist sits under one of those three questions. DETECTION AND WARNING Smoke alarms need to be properly positioned on each floor, working, and giving proper coverage rather than one unit stuck in a hallway and forgotten. Kitchens usually need heat detectors instead, since smoke alarms near cooking just get switched off eventually. Larger buildings need an interconnected alarm system meeting BS 5839, with battery backup, loud enough to actually wake someone asleep. ESCAPE ROUTES This is where an assessor spends most of their time. Routes need adequate width, generally a minimum of 750mm, completely clear of obstructions, with enough alternative exits and acceptable travel distances to the nearest one. The final exit door has to open from the inside...
Read more